VI. Earth Life Emergence: Development of Body, Brain, Selves and Societies
4. Cellular Holobiont Symbiogenesis
Watson, Richard and Jordan Pollack. How Symbiosis Can Guide Evolution. Dario Floreano, et al, eds. Advances in Artificial Life. Berlin: Springer, 1999. Cooperative symbiotic unions can be recognized as a prime force if our perception can move beyond a narrow Darwinian gradualist view.
Despite being undeniably common, the phenomenon of symbiosis, and especially mutualism, has for the most part been treated as a curio; a transient aberration on the otherwise relentless path of mutually-exclusive competition between species. In contrast, enlightened evolutionary theory recognises symbiosis as an integral process, and a fundamental source of innovation, in evolution. (29)
West-Eberhard, Mary Anne. Modularity as a Universal Emergent Property of Biological Traits. Journal of Experimental Zoology B. Online November, 2019. In another response to John Bonner’s call to revise evolutionary theory due to major transitions, the senior Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, University of Costa Rica field and theoretical biologist extols the formative importance of nature’s structural preference for a scale of self-contained whole units nested within larger, bounded entities. This deep propensity is then seen to serve all manner of biological features and viabilities.
Woese, Carl. Evolving Biological Organization. Sapp, Jan, ed. Microbial Phylogeny and Evolution. Oxford University Press, 2005. The veteran biologist continues to revision a more life-like science. An initial evolution of communal cells is seen to involve the “horizontal” exchange of genes, before their subsequent “vertical” transfer between sexual organisms. Because of these findings, the prokaryote model is called into question. Woese goes on to summarize eleven points about cellular evolution from the advent of translation from nucleic to peptide sequence, to more community and complexity, which then set the stage for Darwinian individuals.
The science of biology enters the twenty-first century in turmoil, in a state of conceptual disarray, although at first glance this is far from apparent. (99) The time has come to shift biology’s focus from trying to understand organisms solely by dissecting them into their parts to trying to understand the fundamental nature of biological organization, of biological form. (100) The organism is not a machine! (100)
Woese, Carl. On the Evolution of Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99/13, 2002. This pioneer researcher finds the origin of cellular organization arises from an ecosystem-like community of diverse cell designs which share novel features. This is informed by ‘horizontal gene transfers’ which constitutes ‘a universal genetic code.’ Evolution began in earnest when these cells gained the capacity for ‘symbolic representation’ as it opened vast new niches. Woese then sees human language as its latest manifestation.
Yong, Ed. I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life. New York: Ecco Books, 2016. An award-winning science writer reveals the prolific internal bacterial colonies which are a vital basis of our bodily and Earthly sustenance. Indeed, the whole course of life’s evolution could be seen as a “Microbiocene” age.
Yukalov, Viacheslav, et al. New Approach to Modeling Symbiosis in Biological and Social Systems. arXiv:1408.0111. As an example of the current conceptual synthesis of communal life with physical matter, with Elizaveta Yukalova and Didier Sornette, ETH Zurich information theorists explain nature’s pervasive tendency to form mutually beneficial groupings in terms of statistical mechanics. Some keywords are: mathematical models of symbiosis, nonlinear differential equations, dynamics of coexisting species, dynamical system bifurcations. And the deeper implication, a step rarely taken, is to realize and affirm an independent source program for this universal complementarity of entity and empathy.
Zilber-Rosenberg, Ilana and Eugene Rosenberg. Role of Microorganisms in the Evolution of Animals and Plants: The Hologenome Theory of Evolution. FEMS Mcirobiology Review. 32/5, 2013. Open University of Israel and Tel Aviv University scientists pick up on growing realizations that symbiotic associations pervade and foster every domain of biology and evolution from animals and plants to ecosystems. In this paper, this common phenomena is seen to extend even to their genomic source. Search Lynn Margulis for its foundations, and Jan Sapp, Scott Gilbert, and Alfred Tauber, for the latest ramifications. A 2013 book length treatment The Hologenome Concept by the authors has now come out from Springer.
We present here the hologenome theory of evolution, which considers the holobiont (the animal or plant with all of its associated microorganisms) as a unit of selection in evolution. The hologenome is defined as the sum of the genetic information of the host and its microbiota. The theory is based on four generalizations: (1) All animals and plants establish symbiotic relationships with microorganisms. (2) Symbiotic microorganisms are transmitted between generations. (3) The association between host and symbionts affects the fitness of the holobiont within its environment. (4) Variation in the hologenome can be brought about by changes in either the host or the microbiota genomes; under environmental stress, the symbiotic microbial community can change rapidly. These points taken together suggest that the genetic wealth of diverse microbial symbionts can play an important role both in adaptation and in evolution of higher organisms. During periods of rapid changes in the environment, the diverse microbial symbiont community can aid the holobiont in surviving, multiplying and buying the time necessary for the host genome to evolve. The distinguishing feature of the hologenome theory is that it considers all of the diverse microbiota associated with the animal or the plant as part of the evolving holobiont. Thus, the hologenome theory fits within the framework of the ‘superorganism’ proposed by Wilson and Sober. (Abstract)