|
IV. Ecosmomics: Independent, UniVersal, Complex Network Systems and a Genetic Code-Script Source2. The Innate Affinity of Genomes, Proteomes and Language Holzer, Jacqueline. Genomes & Language. http://www.liu.se/isk/research/doc/Birgitta_forum.pdf. An extensive summary from a Birgitta Forum held in August 2002 in Vadstena, Sweden, reviewed more in Emergent Genetic Information. Holzer, Jacqueline. Genomes & Language. http://www.liu.se/isk/research/doc/Birgitta_forum.pdf. A website for the conference program and lengthy Concluding Reflections from a Birgitta Forum held in August 2002 in Vadstena, Sweden. Geneticists and linguists are finding much commonality between these archetypal formative modes upon which our life and world is founded. A main resource is the work of the German philosopher Wolfgang Raible, who also spoke, Google for his 2001 paper “Linguistic and Genetics. Systematic Parallels”. Geneticists, when presenting the structure of the human genome, seem to find the metaphor of the genome as a book, or a text, useful. Genomes and texts are both multiply articulated structures, where purely contrastive units – phonemes, letters, bases – combine to form meaningful units at several levels of increasing complexity – words, sentences, texts; codons, genes, chromosomes. (4) In a very profound way he (Raible) shows the structural similarities between linguistics and genetics and sees herein a “deeper relationship between the ‘grammar of biology’ and the grammar of natural languages.” In both systems, the principles allowing the reconstruction of multi-dimensional wholes from linear sequences of basic elements are identical: double articulation, different classes of ‘signs,’ hierarchy, combinatorial rules: wholes are always more that the sum of their parts. (Holzer, 5)
Igamberdiev, Abir and Nikita Shklovskiy-Kordi.
Computational Power and Generative Capacity of Genetic Systems.
BioSystems.
142-143/1,
2016.
A Memorial University of Newfoundland theoretical biologist and a National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow research physician contribute to the intent of this journal (second quote) to achieve a natural philosophy of life’s evolution as an oriented ascent from an innately conducive cosmos. In this encompassing genesis, a “generative” agency is a textual essence which rises in kind from a physical matrix to genomic and linguistic manifestations. Once again, after decades of study, it is strongly put that these two prime codes are one and the same. Semiotic characteristics of genetic sequences are based on the general principles of linguistics formulated by Ferdinand de Saussure, such as the arbitrariness of sign and the linear nature of the signifier. Besides these semiotic features that are attributable to the basic structure of the genetic code, the principle of generativity of genetic language is important for understanding biological transformations. The problem of generativity in genetic systems arises to a possibility of different interpretations of genetic texts, and corresponds to what Alexander von Humboldt called “the infinite use of finite means”. These interpretations appear in the individual development as the spatiotemporal sequences of realizations of different textual meanings, as well as the emergence of hyper-textual statements about the text itself, which underlies the process of biological evolution. These interpretations are accomplished at the level of the readout of genetic texts by the structures, which includes DNA, RNA and the corresponding enzymes operating with molecular addresses. The molecular computer performs physically manifested mathematical operations and possesses both reading and writing capacities. Generativity paradoxically resides in the biological computational system as a possibility to incorporate meta-statements about the system, and thus establishes the internal capacity for its evolution. (Abstract) Jolma, Arttu, et al. DNA-dependent Formation of Transcription Factor Pairs Alters Their Binding Specificity. Nature. 527/384, 2015. A Karolinska Institute, Sweden group and colleagues, led by Jussi Talpale, report a unique parsing of nucleotide genetics by treating them much as a linguistic script. The achievement was noted in a Science Daily item for November 15, 2015 (Google SD and article keywords) entitled Complex Grammar of the Genomic Language. A gene regulatory code is thus composed by “DNA words,” which can be seen to combine and compound just as lexicons and sentences. Kay, Lily. A Book of Life?: How the Genome Became an Information System and DNA a Language. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 41/4, 1998. The late philosopher of science discerns intrinsic congruities between the verbal and genetic codes. Kay, Lily. Who Wrote the Book of Life? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000. A premier history of science study of how a linguistic metaphor came to represent the genetic code. The author goes on to note a correspondence between molecular genetics, language and the Chinese divination system, the I Ching. As with (linguist Roman) Jakobson, the answer was affirmative (to the question of one basic code) and pointed to a universe fundamentally different from that portrayed in Jacques Monod’s Chance and Necessity. Rather than viewing DNA-based life as a product of chance, it would be chance subject to the structures and patterns of the I Ching. And rather than being a gypsy living on the edge of an alien world, as Monod decried, a human being would enjoy a deep sense of security that emerged from being planted physically and spiritually in an internal natural order. (318) Lackova, Ludmila, et al. Arbitrariness is not Enough: Towards a Functional Approach to the Genetic Code. Theory in Biosciences. Online May, 2017. Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic linguists Lackova, Vladimir Matlach, and Dan Faltynek build a case for a semiotic definition of genomic conveyance. By this view, similar to written and oral communications, nucleotides and proteins are all about signs, symbols, interpretation and transcription. Apropos, from our home page a slide presentation, Cosmic Genesis in the 21st Century, that I gave at Palacky University in 2005 can be accessed. Arbitrariness in the genetic code is one of the main reasons for a linguistic approach to molecular biology: the genetic code is usually understood as an arbitrary relation between amino acids and nucleobases. However, from a semiotic point of view, arbitrariness should not be the only condition for definition of a code, consequently it is not completely correct to talk about “code” in this case. Semiotically, a code should be always associated with a function and we propose to define the genetic code not only relationally (in basis of relation between nucleobases and amino acids) but also in terms of function (function of a protein as meaning of the code). In fact, if the function of a protein represents the meaning of the genetic code (the sign’s object), then it is crucial to reconsider the notion of its expression (the sign) as well. In our contribution, we will show that the actual model of the genetic code is not the only possible and we will propose a more appropriate model from a semiotic point of view. (Abstract) Lackova, Ludmilla. Folding of a Peptide Continuum: Semiotic Approach to Protein Folding. Semiotica. 233/77, 2020. The Palacky University, Olomouc, CR linguist continues her studies of innate affinities across genetic, metabolic and onto communicative codes, which each seem to have a common textual nature. What then might be their phenomenal message as we first grade readers try to interpret, translate and understand? In this paper I attempt to study the notion of “folding of a semiotic continuum” in a direction of a possible application to the biological processes (protein folding). The process of obtaining protein structures is compared to the folding of a semiotic continuum. Consequently, peptide chain is presented as a continuous line potential to be formed (folded) in order to create functional units. The functional units are protein structures having a certain usage in the cell or organism (semiotic agents). Moreover, protein folding is analyzed in terms of tension between syntax and semantics. (Abstract) Lee, Ji-Hoon, et al. A DNA Assembly Model of Sentence Generation. BioSystems. Online, June, 2011. Seoul National University, Kyungpook National University, and University of Arkansas, bioinformatic scientists add to the evidence that these widely separated generative sources of life and culture share deep affinities with regard to their grammatical structures. Since the inklings of Roman Jakobson and Jean Piaget in the 1970s and earlier that genome and “languagome” (just coined) are deeply similar, this emergent evolutionary correspondence has been steadily proven, which this whole section seeks to document. Recent results of corpus-based linguistics demonstrate that context-appropriate sentences can be generated by a stochastic constraint satisfaction process. Exploiting the similarity of constraint satisfaction and DNA self-assembly, we explore a DNA assembly model of sentence generation. The words and phrases in a language corpus are encoded as DNA molecules to build a language model of the corpus. Given a seed word, the new sentences are constructed by a parallel DNA assembly process based on the probability distribution of the word and phrase molecules. Here, we present our DNA code word design and report on successful demonstration of their feasibility in wet DNA experiments of a small scale. (Abstract) Li, Zhi, et al. Extracting DNA Words Based on the Sequence Features. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 13/2, 2016. Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China researchers carry out a formal interpretation of genetic systems by way of linguistic and textual terms. Nucleotide strings appear as a language with words, sentences, vocabularies, so that genomes are akin to a written book. This deep correspondence is braced by a novel algorithm that traces salient aspects of non-uniform distributions and integrity. Its validity is checked by applying to a select English volume, The Holy Bible (see quotes). How fortuitous, for here is evidence of a direct relation between religious scripture and a naturome code, God’s word and works. Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China researchers carry out a formal interpretation of genetic systems by way of linguistic and textual terms. Nucleotide strings appear as a language with words, sentences, vocabularies, so that genomes are akin to a written book. This deep correspondence is braced by a novel algorithm that traces salient aspects of non-uniform distributions and integrity. Its validity is checked by applying to a select English volume, The Holy Bible (see quotes). How fortuitous, for here is evidence of a direct relation between religious scripture and a naturome code, God’s word and works. Lin, Yigun, et al.. Exploiting Hierarchical Interactions for Protein Surface Learning. arXiv:2401.10144. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore computer scientists post another frontier instance of creative ways to learn to read and write life’s amino acid metabolism. Predicting interactions between proteins is a main project in structural bioinformatics which is often based on geometric and chemical features. Here, we propose key properties of a more effective learning process: 1) relationship atoms linked by covalent bonds to form biomolecules 2): a residue effect that validates hierarchical feature interactions among atoms and surface points). In this paper, we present a principled framework based on deep learning techniques, namely Hierarchical Chemical and Geometric Feature Interaction Network (HCGNet), for protein surface analysis by bridging chemical and geometric features with hierarchical interactions. (Excerpt) List, Johann-Mattis, et al. Networks of Lexical Borrowing and Lateral Gene Transfer in Language and Genome Evolution. BioEssays. Online December, 2013. From our late vantage, Philipps-University Marburg, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, linguists and biologists achieve a keen observation about the historical study and affinity of these disparate programs. The course of linguistics has mostly been reconstructed in terms of vertical “trees,” which is also how eukaryote cellular life proceeds. But language history is actually seen to take horizontal, net-like pathways through sharings, akin to how microbial prokaryotes trade genetic materials. So a further, novel correspondence can be elucidated between genome and languagome. See also in BioEssays 36/1, 2014 Horizontal Gene Acquisitions by Eukaryotes as Drivers of Adaptive Evolution by Gerald Schonknecht, et al, whence such parallel traffic occurs for these nucleated cells. Like biological species, languages change over time. As noted by Darwin, there are many parallels between language evolution and biological evolution. Insights into these parallels have also undergone change in the past 150 years. Just like genes, words change over time, and language evolution can be likened to genome evolution accordingly, but what kind of evolution? There are fundamental differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic evolution. In the former, natural variation entails the gradual accumulation of minor mutations in alleles. In the latter, lateral gene transfer is an integral mechanism of natural variation. The study of language evolution using biological methods has attracted much interest of late, most approaches focusing on language tree construction. These approaches may underestimate the important role that borrowing plays in language evolution. Network approaches that were originally designed to study lateral gene transfer may provide more realistic insights into the complexities of language evolution. (List Abstract)
Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Introduction |
GENESIS VISION |
LEARNING PLANET |
ORGANIC UNIVERSE |