(logo) Natural Genesis (logo text)
A Sourcebook for the Worldwide Discovery of a Creative Organic Universe
Table of Contents
Genesis Vision
Learning Planet
Organic Universe
Earth Life Emerge
Genesis Future
Recent Additions

VIII. Pedia Sapiens: A New Genesis Future

D. EarthOva 2021: An Ecosmocene Destiny

    As the prior sections of A Genesis Future attest, on the far side of our imminent uniVerse and humanVerse discovery is a grand opportunity to begin an open evolitionary destiny. These august potentials for intelligent life to consciously take up and carry forth, as it seems we are meant to do, offer even more evidence for a phenomenal natural genesis. Within our 2020 EarthKinder revolution, the cosmos no longer wastes away into darkness as before. Rather if our sentient, capable, Earthmost success is factored in, its cocreation can grow in light and life. And we choose a green galaxy image to accord with Freeman Dyson’s vision of The Greening of the Galaxy (search FD and Shenker). (And I was present at a talk he gave in New York in 1972 when he first spoke of this.) The green galaxy image is NGC 1232 photographed by the European Southern Observatory.


As our future frontiers at last open upon an infinite dimensionality, we have recently posted a new title. It is a composite from a stellar Supernova, along with James Lovelock’s 2019 book Novacene. It is proposed for the moment in a self-creative genesis universe when an optimum Earthmost sapience may gain a state of aware conscious knowledge and evolutionary cocreativity. For a reference, see herein a similar 2008 allusion by Giulio Tononi.

2020: As we Earthlings become freely empowered to imagine our near and far destines, this final section gathers a diverse array of imaginations. For example, visionary Russian Cosmism (George Young, Historic Prescience) has long felt that human beings are meant to take up and carry forth the future cocreation of an animate, aware universe. And to take license once more, beyond Guardians of the Galaxy, might we valiant peoples aspire to be Champions of the Cosmos?

Baum, Seth, et al. Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization. Foresight.Online January, 2019.

Dosovic, Vladimir, et al. Advanced Aspects of the Galactic Habitability. arXiv:1904.01062.

Dyson, Freeman. A Vision of a Green Universe. New York Review of Books. October 13, 2016.

Haussler, David. Odds for an Enlightened Rather than Barren Future. arXiv:1608.05776.

Kaku, Michio. The Future of Humanity. New York: Doubleday, 2018.

Salcido, Jaime, et al. What Does the Future of Our Universe Hold?. arXiv:1710.06861.

Zenil, Hector. Reprogramming Matter, Life, and Purpose. arXiv:1704.00725.

2020: As we Earthlings become freely empowered to imagine our near and far cocreative destines, this final section gathers a diverse array of imaginations. A visionary Russian Cosmism view (George Young, Historic Prescience) has long felt that human beings are ordained to take up and complete the ecosmic future of a universal genesis. To take license once more, in addition to Guardians of the Galaxy, might we actually aspire to be Champions of the Cosmos?

Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. www.bis-spaceflight.com/publicB2.htm. For many years this periodical has contained in its pages some of the most imaginative considerations on human futures in space, the possibility other intelligent, advanced worlds in the galaxy and of what kind of universe this might actually be.

SETI Decoding Alien Intelligence Workshop. https://daiworkshop.seti.org/guest-papers. A unique meeting with a stellar cast to begin to wonder all about extraterrestrial neighbors, relative life forms, (linguistic) communications, and much more, held at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, CA in March 2018. The event was cast as a response to Nathalie Cabrol’s 2016 paper Alien Mindscapes (search) which entered in initial litany of topics and concerns. On the above site, abstracts and papers are posted such as Astrobiology: Thy Name is Synergy by Penelope Boston, Evolving SETI for the 21st Century by Steven Dick, Bio-Friendly Exoplanets by Seth Shostak, The Spiritual Quest in the SETI Research by Jose Funes, SJ, and Cognitive Planetary Transformations by David Grinspoon. Some other speakers were Jill Tarter, Lori Marino, Annamarie Berea, Terence Deacon, and Erik Zackrisson. A tacit assumption, it ought to be noted, was to treat exoworld civilizations, if they exist, as a whole, thinking planet, noosphere entity (but this Earth was not yet appreciated that way).

Perhaps what SETI is searching for is not merely the appearance of a certain kind of civilization on a planet, but a transition in planetary evolution to what we might call the Sapiezoic Eon, in which cognitive processes become integrated into the functioning of a planet. Now we see the advent of a radically new type of global change: Self-aware cognitive/geological processes. If the “Anthropocene” marks the beginning of the Sapiezoic Eon - then it requires that cognitive processes can become a long-term stable part of a planet. Global technological influence contains both perils which threaten to make this a short-lived stage and the possibility that this phenomenon could become a very long-lived and even permanent part of the Earth system. I will discuss the possible observable properties of planets that have gone through a Sapiezoic transition. (Grinspoon)

The “wave-particle” theory of communication: communication as both means and meaning of information exchange. Shannon explored only the “wave” theory of communication as a means of exchanging information, devoid of meaning. On another hand, semiotics and cryptography explore the “particle” theory of communication – the meaning of communication devoid of the means of communicating. Therefore mapping communication from cells to societies in distinct terms of means and meaning of communication would help understand where the two aspects of the phenomenon of communication converge and where they diverge. (Berea, 1-2)

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence research assumes that we live in a bio-friendly universe. But do we live in a spiritual-friendly universe? We propose to include the spiritual quest in a new multidisciplinary approach to SETI. We consider different types of alien civilizations by including a Spiritual factor according to the characteristics of those civilizations as described in this paper. We propose to simulate the number of planets where there is a Communicating Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CETI) in our Galaxy. To validate our thought experiment, we propose to apply this model to the different ages of human history trying to describe different alien civilizations according to the Spiritual factor. (Funes)

Adams, Fred and Gregory Laughlin. The Five Ages of the Universe. New York: Free Press, 1999. An example of the old doom scenario with a megabillion year cosmic history divided into inflationary, radiative, stellar, black hole and dark periods. The universe inexorably burns out because a phenomenal role for life, mind and informed spirit can not be imagined.

Armstrong, Rachel, ed. Star Ark: A Living, Self-Sustaining Spaceship. International: Springer Praxis, 2017. The editor (search) is a visionary British eco-architect who conceived this unique volume to broach how human beings may commence upon travel to stellar, galactic and cosmic habitation so as to convey forth, seed and propagate life and mind. There are two sections – An Ecological View of the Interstellar Question by RA, as the quote cites, and An Anthology of Interstellar Culture with entries such as Space Ecology by Michael Mautner and Simon Park, Constructing Worlds by Jordan Geiger and Mark Morris, and especially Connecting with the Divine and the Sacred, and becoming Cosmically Conscious by Steve Fuller (second quote), Roberto Chiotti, and Krists Ernstons.

Part A, written by Rachel Armstrong, proposes a new age of space exploration based on an ecological perspective of the cosmos. It is this that will create the conditions for inhabiting
starships and, ultimately, new worlds. Drawing on her leadership of the Persephone Project (Google), this section adopts an experimental, yet testable, and inclusive approach to constructing a livable and self-sustaining starship. Persephone is part of the Icarus Interstellar group’s portfolio of work – an international consortium of aerospace engineers aiming to construct a starship research platform in Earth’s orbit within the next hundred years. This means a series of Earth-bound experiments are being detailed through a wide range of laboratory types that inform us about how we live with and design ecosystems on this planet – and beyond. (Preface)

Expanding the scope of the human in search of the divine: The task ahead may be formidable, but hardly insurmountable. After all, “humanity” is a normative category that has been extended only with great difficulty to all members of Homo sapiens —and, arguably, that task has yet to reach completion. And each time a new class, gender, race, or religion has been incorporated, the meaning of “human” has changed, typically by shifting the default position of what counts as “normal.” (392) It is common nowadays both among the secular and the religious to reduce the value of being “human” to the value of life itself. However, for those who still appreciate the human as the form of divine self-disclosure, there is everything to play for, as we stretch our imaginations and our capacities in search of what it means to be “human,” not only on Earth, but across the cosmos. (Fuller 394)

Armstrong, Stuart and Anders Sandberg. Eternity in Six Hours: Intergalactic Spreading of Intelligent Life and Sharpening the Fermi Paradox. Acta Astronautica. 89/1, 2013. The physicist Enrico Fermi famously asked in the 1950s that for a universe then thought to be rife with advanced civilizations, so “Where is everybody?” This question has been much debated since, a Wikipedia entry under its name provides a good survey. Here Oxford University, Future of Humanity Institute, philosophers contend that galactic travel and celestial reengineering are really not prohibitive, so once a world which did not destroy itself got unified and going, they should have formed evident reconstructions. But nothing like a “Dyson sphere” built by a civilization around its star has been seen. Even though Kepler satellite discoveries forecast some quintillions of earth-like bioplanets across galactic spacescape, the authors go on to allude that there may not be anyone else out there.

The Fermi paradox is the discrepancy between the strong likelihood of alien intelligent life emerging (under a wide variety of assumptions) and the absence of any visible evidence for such emergence. In this paper, we extend the Fermi paradox to not only life in this galaxy, but to other galaxies as well. We do this by demonstrating that travelling between galaxies – indeed even launching a colonisation project for the entire reachable universe – is a relatively simple task for a star-spanning civilisation, requiring modest amounts of energy and resources. We start by demonstrating that humanity itself could likely accomplish such a colonisation project in the foreseeable future, should we want to. Given certain technological assumptions, such as improved automation, the task of constructing Dyson spheres, designing replicating probes, and launching them at distant galaxies, become quite feasible. We extensively analyse the dynamics of such a project, including issues of deceleration and collision with particles in space. Using similar methods, there are millions of galaxies that could have reached us by now. This results in a considerable sharpening of the Fermi paradox. (Abstract)

The “we are the first/only civilization” explanation is also weakened from the expanded potential origin space: the likelihood of intelligent life must be reduced by many orders of magnitude compared to previous arguments. If this explanation is the true answer, the future is also far bigger than commonly thought; (post)humanity can expand over very vast distances and achieve very large populations in an otherwise empty and value-less universe. We may hence be obliged to safeguard the potential value of this vast future from risk to a far greater degree than is normally recognized. (12)

Baum, Seth, et al. Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization. Foresight. Online January, 2019. As the Abstract notes, 14 futurists from the USA, UK, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Canada, and Russia including James Miller, Kaj Sotala, Robin Hanson and Karin Kuhlemann draw out four main concerns, options, and pathways as we planetary peoples enter a perilous moment. Anthropic societal and technological capabilities could conceivably keep pace with palliative and procreative solutions, if they can be agreed upon and practically implemented. But we might add that an epochal cosmos and conscious change, a unitary worldwise mission agreement, say Make Earth Great Always MEGA, is a missing imperative.

Purpose: This paper formalizes long-term trajectories of human civilization as a
scientific and ethical field of study. The long-term trajectory of human civilization can be defined as the path that human civilization takes during the entire future time period in which human civilization could continue to exist. Approach: We focus on four types of trajectories: status quo trajectories, in which human civilization persists in a state broadly similar to its current state into the distant future; catastrophe trajectories, in which one or more events cause significant harm to human civilization; technological transformation trajectories, in which radical technological breakthroughs put human civilization on a fundamentally different course; and astronomical trajectories, in which human civilization expands beyond its home planet and into the accessible portions of the cosmos. Findings: Status quo trajectories appear unlikely to persist into the distant future, especially in light of long-term astronomical processes.

Beech, Martin. Rejuvenating the Sun and Avoiding Other Global Catastrophes. New York: Springer, 2008. The University of Regina astronomer tabulates the litany of impending perils along with ambitious responses to gain a cosmic prowess able to take over and sustain an environmental milieu favorable for life, humankind, and precious biosphere. In this largest scenario, earth might appear as a stochastic fertile egg embryo at term whom needs to select her/his self as a special center of successful life and mind.

Bertka, Constance, ed. Exploring the Origin, Extent, and Future of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. As seen by a mix of scientists, such as Robert Hazen and Christopher McKay, historians Steven Dick and Iris Fry, and theologians such as Ernan McMullin and Richard Randolph, God’s creation lately expands to a cosmic space and duration, which ought to be filled with various life forms of ethical merit. But these deliberations again go on with no imagination of a phenomenal universe with a discernible identity, purpose, and destiny of its own. Within any religious valuation, everything still remains skewed to a Creator, rather than allowing for a place and role for sentient Sapiens.

Bonnet, Roger-Maurice and Lodewijk Woltjer. Surviving 1,000 Centuries. Berlin: Springer/Praxis, 2008. Bonnet is Director of the International Space Science Institute in Bern, Switzerland, and Woltjer is with the French Saint-Michel l’Observatoire. As a human cognitive vista lately expands to a worldwide scale, we can begin to take stock of our past, present, and future local, global and galactic environs. A methodical survey discusses how to avoid a plethora of hazards and to achieve a viable peace over eons to come on earth as it is in the heavens.

Broderick, Damien. Year Million: Science at the Far Edge of Knowledge. New York: Atlas & Co, 2008. A collection of original essays by expansive thinkers such as Catherine Asaro, Gregory Benford, and Rudy Rucker about the long future of creative human beings, mindful intelligences, and cosmic destinies. The title phrase is from H. G. Wells which serves to define this vast vista. Two options then seem to vie – an advance of regnant galactic life over nutrient matter, or an inexorable drift to entropic darkness. But an imagination to ask whatever such a universe might be all about and for is still absent, and without which much remains aimless speculation.

Burdyuzka, Vladimir, ed. The Future of Life and of Our Civilization. Berlin: Springer, 2006. The proceedings of a May 2005 conference held in Budapest, Hungary. Some 26 well-intentioned fellows plumb a cosmic context for our worldly fate in sections such as Life as a Space Phenomena, The Origin of Life, Conservation of Life, and Are We Alone? Papers range from “The Spread of Life Throughout the Cosmos” by Chandra Wickramasinghe, “Planetary Cosmogony” by Alexander Bagrov, Josip Kleczek’s “Energy in the Universe and Its Availability to Mankind,” “There are 6 Million Tons of Brain Matter in the World, Why do We Use It so Unwisely” by Boris Zakhariev, and onto Brian Marcotte’s “Eco-Ethics Must be the Main Science of the Future.” Of note is polymath Andrei Kirilyuk’s “Towards Sustainable Future by Transition to the Next Level Civilization,” which advances his “universal concept of dynamic complexity,” see his arXiv/physics for postings. But the brave effort languishes, as all such works, without an imagination of a greater discernable creation, a nested genesis, of which human and earth are a pivotal phenomenon. I read this as an “e-book” in the University of Massachusetts at Amherst library. As a result, a nascent evolutionary emergence to a super-organic noosphere just reaching its own knowledge and cognizance is also rarely considered.

Calder, Nigel. Spaceships of the Mind. New York: Viking, 1978. As I rewrite four decades in 2021, the British science communicator presciently considers the post-Copernican options of an alien, moribund universe or one which innately grows in cognizant knowledge and galactic organization by way of the cocreative activity of aware, intelligent beings.

In talking with scientists about the human niche within the vast and ancient universe revealed by modern astronomy, I detected very different kinds of ‘intuitive feelings about nature.’ Some saw us diminished: all we could do was try to snatch a little dignity in cultivating our planet, and draw a little pride and rationality from our understanding of the universe. Another feeling reflected strongly in this book, was that human beings had the collective knowledge and skill to start transforming the universe to their own purposes. (13)

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7  Next