VI. Earth Life Emergence: Development of Body, Brain, Selves and Societies
A. A Survey of Common Principles
Many references which introduce and describe common principles and phenomena are cited in Parts III: Organic Universe, IV: A Cosmic Code and V: A Quickening Evolution. This natural genesis found by a worldwide science develops from a singular, independent creative system distinguished by agent and relation, individual and group, masculine and feminine-like complements. Their dynamic activity gives rise to an emergent, self-organized evolutionary nest of complexity and sentience. In this manner, the universal source becomes manifestly exemplified at each stage of a living nature. From non-random genomes to desert biotas, human commerce, global climate, and the interstellar raiment, the same pattern and process repeats over and over. Modularity, symbiosis, autopoiesis, complementarity, synchronicity, self-similarity, scale-free, power-law networks occur in every instance.
Center for Fractal Design. www.fractal.org. Julius Ruis, the Director of this Netherlands based Fractal Design and Consultancy, has emailed me (March 2008) his compliments and to notify about his own many-faceted website. We are pleased to list as a portal to visually appreciate a nested, creative self-similarity which enlivens every aspect of a natural genesis from cosmos to cauliflowers to civilizations. The site requires some negotiation, but is filled with treasures.
, . Fractals: Hunting the Hidden Dimension. www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/fractals. This luminous Nova program aired on October 28, 2008 muses at its close that Galileo’s mathematical book of nature is at last legible via an intrinsic geometry not of Euclidean forms but of an infinitely variegated self-similarity. The presentation dutifully engages leading contributors over the years such as Ralph Abraham, James Brown, Ron Eglash, Brian Enquist, Ary Goldberger, Geoffrey West, and so on. But a prime distinction is an extended visit with its renowned founder Benoit Mandelbrot. As one example, a research team led by ecologist Enquist is shown measuring tree branches in a Costa Rican forest and concludes that one plant and a whole biota share a common, recurrent structure, verily that a tree recapitulates its forest. A nested natural iteration is thus revealed as creation’s mathematical basis now takes on a fractal form.
Agnati, Luigi, et al. Mosaic, Self-Similarity Logic and Biological Attraction Princples. Communicative & Integrative Biology. 2/6, 2009. With co-authors Peter Barlow, Frantisek Baluska, and Diego Guidolin, Italian, German, and British theorists contribute to the growing witness of an independent, genome-like, natural topology and its constant dynamics. The quotes seem to evince a grand genesis discovery, if we could only allow ourselves and imagine.
From a structural standpoint, living organisms are organized like a nest of Russian matryoshka dolls, in which structures are buried within one another. From a temporal point of view, this type of organisation is the result of a history comprised of a set of time backcloths which have accompanied the passage of living matter from its origins up to the present day. The aim of the present paper is to indicate a possible course of this passage through time and suggest how today’s complexity has been reached by living organisms. (552)
Ahn, Yong-Yeol, et al. Link Communities Reveal Multiscale Complexity in Networks. Nature. 466/761, 2010. Researchers from the Center for Complex Network Research, Northeastern University; Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University; Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard; and the College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern, resolve a conceptual issue about how to allocate, describe, and understand such omnipresent relational form and fluidity. However then by such interdisciplinarity might it dawn that a grand genesis universe is revealed with a once and future, above and below, replication that we might avail for a better world? What time is it, whom altogether is learning, in translation are we reading a cosmic to child genetic code?
Networks have become a key approach to understanding systems of interacting objects, unifying the study of diverse phenomena including biological organisms and human society. One crucial step when studying the structure and dynamics of networks is to identify communities: groups of related nodes that correspond to functional subunits such as protein complexes or social spheres. (761) Here we reinvent communities as groups of links rather than nodes and show that this unorthodox approach successfully reconciles the antagonistic organizing principles of overlapping communities and hierarchy. In contrast to the existing literature, which has entirely focused on grouping nodes, link communities naturally incorporate overlap while revealing hierarchical organization. (761) Our results imply that link communities are fundamental building blocks that reveal overlap and hierarchical organization in networks to be two aspects of the same phenomenon. (761)
Alon, Uri. Simplicity in Biology. Nature. 446/497, 2007. Although life, from proteins to genes, bacteria and metabolic organisms, epitomizes dynamic complexity, recent studies find shared principles which engender motifs and networks that repeat at every phase. These convergent, modular patterns and processes constantly recur as they take on this universal mathematical form.
Amaral, L. and J. Ottino. Augmenting the Framework for the Study of Complex Systems. European Physics Journal B. 38/2, 2004. An introduction to a special issue on the ubiquitous presence of scale-free dynamic networks from food webs and epidemics to neural phenomena and especially the worldwide Internet. In this regard a generic definition of complex systems is attempted, see the quote below. These elemental units and interactions then self-organize into a universal, nested self-similarity.
A complex system is a system with a large number of elements, building blocks or agents, capable of interacting with each other and with their environment. The common characteristic of all complex systems is that they display organization without any external organizing being applied. The whole is much more than the sum of its parts. (148)
Anteneodo, Celia and M. G. E. da Luz. Complex Dynamics of Life at Different Scales: From Genomic to Global Environmental Issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 368/5561, 2010. Brazilian biophysicists introduce a special issue that exemplifies the scientific verification across nature’s nested realms of life’s vital, inherent, ascendant, bountiful intricacy. The issue is available online with full, free access. Typical papers of note are Rudolf, Hanel, et al, “Living on the Edge of Chaos: Minimally Nonlinear Models of Genetic Regulatory Dynamics;” Pablo Gleiser and Victor Spoormaker on “Modelling Hierarchical Structure in Function Brain Networks;” and “Complex Dynamics of Our Economic Life on Different Scales” by Tobais Preis, Daniel Reith and Eugene Stanley.
In very general terms, complexity arises from relatively simple interactions among numerous mutually interacting parts. Despite the simplicity of the governing rules, a rich collective dynamic emerges which is quite distinct from that of the individual elements. (5562)
Balasis, Georgios, et al. Universality in Solar Flare, Magnetic Storm and Earthquake Dynamics using Tsallis Statistical Mechanics. Physica A. In Press, October, 2010. Astrophysicists from Athens and Paris contribute to a rush of recognitions and explanations from experiment and theory of a constant form and flux in every stellar and geospheric corner, which surely augurs for a common mathematical origin.
The new field of complex system studies holds that the dynamics of various complex systems are founded on universal principles, which can be used to describe disparate problems. A basic reason for our interest in complexity is the striking similarity in behavior near the global instability among systems that are otherwise quite different in nature. The observed similarity suggests a common approach to the interpretation of these diverse phenomena in terms of driving physical mechanisms that have the same character.
Banavar, Jayanth, et al.
Form, Function, and Evolution of Living Organisms.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The international team of Banavar, Todd Cooke, Andrea Rinaldo, and Amos Maritan (search each) broach a synthesis after years of research by many scientists upon the persistent, mathematical topologies of plants and animals. From innate natural principles, a universal self-similarity is found to be expressed by flora and fauna which serves to optimize energetic efficiencies. Once again a constant pattern recurs everywhere, which quite implies an intrinsic animate source.
Despite the vast diversity of sizes and shapes of living organisms, life’s organization across scales exhibits remarkable commonalities, most notably through the approximate validity of Kleiber’s law, the power law scaling of metabolic rates with the mass of an organism. Here, we present a derivation of Kleiber’s law that is independent of the specificity of the myriads of organism species. Specifically, we account for the distinct geometries of trees and mammals as well as deviations from the pure power law behavior of Kleiber’s law, and predict the possibility of life forms with geometries intermediate between trees and mammals. We also make several predictions in excellent accord with empirical data. Our theory relates the separate evolutionary histories of plants and animals through the fundamental physics underlying their distinct overall forms and physiologies. (Abstract)
Barrat, Alain, et al. Complex Networks: From Biology to Information Technology. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 41/22, 2008. An introduction to the proceedings of a July 2007 STATPHYS23 meeting on the subject which then divides into two main categories – their common Structure and Dynamics, and ubiquitous Biological, Social, and Technological applications. See Porter, et al below for more on this genesis nature.
Baruchi, Itay, et al. Functional Holography of Complex Networks Activity – From Cultures to the Human Brain. Complexity. 10/3, 2005. In a similar way to holographic universe theories (see Quantum Cosmology) Baruchi, along with Vernon Towle and Eshel Ben-Jacob, find that biological and neural networks, in their algorithmic processes, take on the typical properties of a hologram. Here is still another approach which finds nature to be distinguished by the same pattern and process at each scale and instance.
In a similar way to holographic universe theories (see Quantum Cosmology) Baruchi, along with Vernon Towle and Eshel Ben-Jacob, find that biological and neural networks, in their algorithmic processes, take on the typical properties of a hologram. Here is still another approach which finds nature to be distinguished by the same pattern and process at each scale and instance.
Bhattacharyya, Pratip, et al. A Common Mode of Origin of Power Laws in Models of Market and Earthquake. Physica A. 381/377, 2007. From the Theoretical Condensed Matter Physics Division and Centre for Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Saha Instute of Nuclear Physics, and the Physics Department, Gurudas College, Kolkata, India, comes this report of widely separated natural and social domains which are yet seen hold to the same dynamic topologies.
We show that there is a common mode of origin for the power laws observed in two different models: (i) the Pareto law for the distribution of money among the agents with random-saving propensities in an ideal gas-like market model and (ii) the Gutenberg–Richter law for the distribution of overlaps in a fractal-overlap model for earthquakes. The identification of the generic origin of the power laws helps in better understanding and in developing generalized views of phenomena in such diverse areas as economics and geophysics. (377)