|
V. Life's Corporeal Evolution Develops, Encodes and Organizes Itself: An EarthWinian Genesis SynthesisUrdy, Severine. On the Evolution of Morphogenetic Models: Mechano-Chemical Interactions and an Integrated View of Cell Differentiation, Growth, Pattern Formation and Morphogenesis.. Biological Reviews. Online May, 2012. An extensive article with over 250 references by a University of Zurich post-doctoral researcher that surveys the multiplex course of embryological studies from Immanuel Kant to its 20th century post-DNA stage and onto the current systems biology turn. Often due to instrumentation on hand, along with institute, laboratory, and individual penchants and paradigms, three approaches went forth. A “molecular” school dwelt on how cells differentiate due to morphogen gradients. A “chemical” way focused on spatio-temporal heterogeneties from morphogenetics fields. “Mechanists” were concerned with how three-dimensional shapes arose in cells from physical forces. Today, a promise of synthesis is in the air via a novel bioinformatic engagement that can integrate and understand the role and activity of complex, self-organizing dynamics. Major differences among these three schools pertain to the concept of self-organization, and models can be classified as morphostatic or morphodynamic. Various examples illustrate the distorted picture that arises from the distinction among differentiation, growth, pattern formation and morphogenesis, based on the idea that the underlying mechanisms are respectively chemical or mechanical. Emerging quantitative approaches integrate the concepts and methods of complex sciences and emphasize the interplay between hierarchical levels of organization via mechano-chemical interactions. They draw upon recent improvements in mathematical and numerical morphogenetic models and upon considerable progress in collecting new quantitative data. This review highlights a variety of such models, which exhibit important advances, such as hybrid, stochastic and multiscale simulations. (Abstract, 1) Valentine, James. Architectures of Biological Complexity. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 43/1, 2003. A further perception of a nested, iterative genome and subsequent evolution facilitated by scale-free networks. Van de Vijver, Gertrudis, et al. Reflecting on the Complexity of Biological Systems. Acta Biotheoretica. 51/2, 2003. A lengthy historical survey of evolutionary theory from Immanuel Kant’s "self-organizing" beings to the new science of nonlinear dynamics. Kant’s teleological stratification is now revived in terms of nonequilibrium complex adaptive systems. By these advances a novel, revised path for life’s evolution is achieved which combines a ‘universalist’ source with a ‘constructivist’ context which can converge with the 18th century transcendental vision. Van de Vijver, Gertrudis, et al, eds. Evolutionary Systems: Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1998. An early example of a genesis synthesis underway as scientists and philosophers begin the necessary marriage of selective and obvious prior generative forces, chance contingency and lawful cause. Various topics are spontaneity, autocatalysis complex dynamics, development, thermodynamic and informational properties along with a semoitic meaning. Vilmos Csanyi, Alicia Juarrero, Michael Conrad, Juan Alvarez de Lorenzana, George Kampis, Stan Salthe, David Depew, Bruce Weber, Robert Riedl, Susantha Goonatilake, Luis Rocha, John Collier, and others bring novel insights. A 2010 paperback edition has since appeared from Springer. The three well known revolutions of the past centuries - the Copernican, the Darwinian and the Freudian - each in their own way had a deflating and mechanizing effect on the position of humans in nature. They opened up a richness of disillusion: earth acquired a more modest place in the universe, the human body and mind became products of a long material evolutionary history, and human reason, instead of being the central, immaterial, locus of understanding, was admitted into the theater of discourse only as a materialized and frequently out-of-control actor.
Vane-Wright, Richard.
What is Life?: What Might be Said of the Role of Behavior in its Evolution.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.
112/2,
2014.
Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778), the Swedish zoologist founder of biological and ecological taxonomy and nomenclature, would be pleased at a special issue in his name on the many ways that pro-active creatures can influence their own viability and lineage. The emeritus Natural History Museum, London, entomologist here collects authoritative papers from a September 2011 seminar at Burlington House. This introduction, as it ranges widely, is a good synopsis of the state of biological and evolutionary thinking on the verge of an inclusive 21st century synthesis. Sections touch on The Nature of Life on Earth, Can Life be Defined?, to Biotas, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, A Systems View, Self-Organization, Agency, and so on. An introduction and overview are provided for a special issue of the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society concerning the role of behaviour in evolution. Conceptual separation of the process of living from the process of evolution has heuristic value, with the potential to ask better questions about both. Following a short account of the origin of this collection of essays, the first main part of the paper assesses current ideas about the nature of living systems. Because all known taxa apparently constitute a single, monophyletic group (superdomain Biota), life can only be characterized, not defined. The second part reviews the ten papers that, collectively, comprise this special issue. It is concluded that we need to acknowledge both the ‘processes of life’ and the ‘processes’ of evolution and we need to explore the consequences that flow from making this distinction. Behaviour, in its broadest sense, is seen as both the expression and mediator of organismic agency, and must therefore play a key role in the processes of evolution. (Abstract) Verd, Berta and Ruben Perez-Carrasco. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Dynamics in Biology. Interface Focus. April, 2021. Oxford University and Imperial College London researchers introduce this current survey of how the complexity sciences, along with better techniques are well along with a 21st century and 2020s global revolution with regard to life’s procreative evolution. Prime papers are Developmental Modules in Metabolism, Cell and Developmental Biology (J. Jaeger, N. Monk) and Process Homology (J. DiFrisco and JJ) (search each). As a synopsis, a recurrent form and function in kind is newly evident for whole organisms (ontogeny), and across creaturely species (phylogeny). In every case and scale, the same network systems are found to be in vivifying effect. This is an historic achievement and discovery in our midst by way of a proposed Charlotte and Charles EarthWin which Natural Genesis seeks to report and document. It is Time’s Time: Biology is dynamic in nature. From ecological systems to embryonic pattern formation: change is at the centre of any biological phenomenon. The last three decades of molecular genetics have been very successful at identifying the components involved in many biological processes, and we now are at the advent of exciting times where new methodologies and technologies are, for the first time, allowing us to address the dynamics of these processes directly. Life scientists can now quantify the dynamics of biological processes and image them in unprecedented resolution. These and other advances are shifting biological phenomena away from static representations and towards increasingly dynamic and therefore realistic accounts. (First Paragraph) Vermeij, Geerat. Historical Contingency and the Purported Uniqueness of Evolutionary Innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103/1804, 2006. Much local particularity occurs in life’s upward procession but the presence and activity of dynamic self-organization prior to selection serves to guide evolution and history along predictable and repeatable convergent pathways. Purportedly unique innovations either arose from the union and integration of previously independent components or belong to classes of functionally similar innovations. Claims of singularity are therefore not well supported by the available evidence. Details of initial conditions, evolutionary pathways, phenotypes, and timing are contingent, but important ecological, functional, and directional aspects of the history of life are replicable and predictable. (1804) Vermeij, Geerat. Nature: An Economic History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. The distinguished professor of paleoecology at the University of California, Davis achieves a new understanding of biological and social evolution as an inherently economic process. Implicit in this view is the activity of interdependent entities which engage in production, division of labor, consumption, cooperation, shared information, and so on within a larger collective extending from microbes to markets. The same universal principles are noticed to hold at each subsequent stage. A synthesis of this kind may strike many readers as impossibly ambitious, even presumptuous. My response is that there is now sufficient theory and observation available to warrant such a synthesis, however imperfect it maybe. (xi) If the thesis of this book is correct, economic life on our planet has exhibited a long-term, though occasionally interrupted, trend toward increased power and independence….Human history recapitulates these same trends over a greatly compressed time span. (292) Vermeij, Geerat. Power, Competition, and the Nature of History. Paleobiology. Online October, 2019. In this capsule essay, the UC Davis biogeologist draws on his many years of steady research which enables him to recognize and define the presence of a central evolutionary course, as the Abstract and quotes explain. It is really evident that this must be the case from microbes to a metropolis, but natural history has often avoided or denied this admission. See also recent writings by Robert Hazen and George McGhee for similar takes. Historians have debated whether pathways and events from the past to the present are influenced by contingency, the dependence of outcomes on particular prior conditions, or whether there is long-term emergent directional change. Using evidence from the fossil record and the metabolic evolution of organisms, I show here that power (total energy taken up and expended per unit time) has increased stepwise over time at ecosystem and global scales due to the ratchet-like, cumulative effects of competition and cooperation and to the influence of top competitors and opportunistic species. The history of life thus exhibits an emergent directionality at larger ecosystem phases. (Abstract)
Vinicius, Lucio.
Modular Evolution.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2010.
A University of Cambridge, Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, postdoctoral fellow joins the overdue project to revise quite inadequate theories of life’s sequential rise from microbe to artifice. This is deftly done within selection, but with a novel inclusion of nature’s recurrent propensity for modular patterns and processes. But it is noted that Charles himself would not now be a Darwinian with its denial of progress. Once again the present work is braced by Maynard-Smith and Szathmary’s nest of “major transitions,” which is gaining broad currency, along with Jablonka and Lamb’s multi-dimension scale. A meld of 19th and 21st century views is thus sought by advising that such a real procession implies an inescapable advance. In further regard, with Conway Morris, the truth that evolution converges on the same form and function over and over can also no longer be ignored. While self-organizing systems are not broached, Erwin Schrodinger’s 1940s physical “Principle of Order from Order” is revived so as to install a more active, informational role for genetic influences, lately seen in force from molecules to verbiage. With Brian Johnson and Sheung Kwan Lam herein, and an increasing cadre, a younger generation of biological theorists strive apace to flesh out this vital, imperative genesis synthesis. Despite its wide acceptance, the apparent consensus over historical contingency may be unjustified. (18) Convergence conveys the idea that selection has repeatedly driven distinct species to the same evolutionary ends, irrespective of the particularities or historical scars of each lineage: it is therefore a cogent response to the positive constraint argument. (19)
Vujovic, Filip, et al.
Cellular Self-Organization: An Overdrive in Cambrian Diversity?
BioEssays.
July,
2022.
University of Sydney system biophysicians contribute another frontier perception of life’s evolutionary motive occasion as more primarily due to these mathematic procreative agencies, rather than post-selection alone. Their certain subject area is this profuse emergence some 540 mys ago. Some sections are Self-Organization: A Decentralized Algorithm to Transform Chaos into Predictability, Self-Organization and Emergence of Morphological Patterns and Emergence of Form and Function in Cellular Self-Organization. Along with 135 references, graphic displays show how this deep drive (natural genesis) provides a formative, organismic effect prior to selection. occupy multiple ecological niches on earth. A variety of explanations have been proposed for this major evolutionary event termed the “Cambrian explosion.” While most address environmental, developmental, and ecological factors, the biological basis for this accelerated species diversity remains largely open. Here we posit that morphogenesis by self-organization enables an uncoupling of the genomic mutational landscape from phenotypic diversification. We thus suggest that accelerated morphological diversification in the Cambrian transition occurred by an activation dormant (reserved) morphological novelties whose molecular underpinnings were seeded in the Precambrian period. (Excerpt)
Wagner, Andreas.
Arrival of the Fittest.
New York: Current/Penguin,
2014.
With a Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle subtitle, this latest work by the University of Zurich evolutionary biologist achieves an overdue 2010s more complete synopsis of how life’s cosmic and earthly development actually went forth. While the legacy of Charles Darwin, natural selection, and the 1950s modern synthesis are noted, an adequate explanatory theory has eluded. The title phrase is from the Dutch geneticist Hugo de Vries (1848-1935) who wrote while selection causes survival of the fittest organisms, it cannot account for their novel appearances. Thus begins a revolutionary contribution with several significant themes.
[Prev Pages] Previous | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 Next
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Introduction |
GENESIS VISION |
LEARNING PLANET |
ORGANIC UNIVERSE |