|
V. Life's Corporeal Evolution Develops, Encodes and Organizes Itself: An EarthWinian Genesis Synthesis4. Multicellular Fauna and Flora Organisms in Transition Skocelas, Katherine, et al.. The Evolution of Genetic Robustness for Cellular Cooperation in Early Multicellular Organisms. Holler, Silvia, et al, eds.. The 2022 International Conference on Artificial Life. Cambridge: MIT Press., . Six Michigan State University computational biologists from Christoph Adami’s lab including Charles Ofria contribute further quantifications that explain and brace how life’s premier, beneficial transition from cells to creatures so as to achieve a new individuality with even more attributes on the scalar climb, so it seems, to our multi-personal progeny. The major evolutionary transition to multicellularity shifted the unit of selection from individual cells to whole organisms with new attributes to foster cooperation such as error correction and genetic robustness. We study this occasion under a range of evolutionary conditions and focused on early multicellular entities where cells must control their growth to avoid overwriting each other. Ultimately, we demonstrate a clear selective pressure for distinct genetic repertoires that increases with the total number of cells. (Excerpt) Smith, Cameron, et al. Emergence of Self-Reinforcing Information Bottlenecks in Multilevel Selection. arXiv:1506.04611. As the Abstract explains Smith, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, with Matthieu Laneuville and Nicholas Guttenberg, Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo, provide more insights into evolution’s persistence to recurrently form into more complex, inclusive, viable organisms. See similar works by Kapheim, Rehan, Van Gestel, and others as this transitions model grows in veracity. We explain how hierarchical organization of biological systems emerges naturally during evolution, through a transition in the units of individuality. We will show how these transitions are the result of competing selective forces operating at different levels of organization, each level having different units of individuality. Such a transition represents a singular point in the evolutionary process, which we will show corresponds to a phase transition in the way information is encoded, with the formation of self-reinforcing information bottlenecks. We present an abstract model for characterizing these transitions that is quite general, applicable to many different versions of such transitions. As a concrete example, we consider the transition to multicellularity. Specifically, we study a stochastic model where isolated communities of interacting individuals (e.g. cells) undergo a transition to higher-order individuality (e.g. multicellularity). This transition is indicated by the marked decrease in the number of cells utilized to generate new communities from pre-existing ones. In this sense, the community begins to reproduce as a whole via a decreasing number of cells. We show that the fitness barrier to this transition is strongly reduced by horizontal gene transfer. These features capture two of the most prominent aspects of the transition to multicellularity: the evolution of a developmental process and reproduction through a unicellular bottleneck. (Abstract) Smith, Felisa, et al. Body Size Evolution Across the Geozoic. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 44/523, 2016. A dozen scientists from geologists to paleontologists at American universities including Daniel McShea take a billion year retrospective review of life’s complex anatomy and physiology development across the bacteria, archaea, and eukarya domains. Re the second quote, it is evident that this course indeed concludes with a global humanity whom altogether can reconstruct its ancient heritage.
Sogabe, Shunsuke, et al. Pluripotency and the Origin of Animal Multicellularity. Nature. 570/519, 2019. Nine University of Queensland biologists including Sandie and Bernard Degnan contribute to a revisionary understanding of how organisms got going on their evolutionary way. Instead of a single step via clumped unicells, ancestral ur-cells are seen to differentiate at various stages in a life cycle before actual multicellularity. This effect is conveyed by the term pluripotency for cellular material capable to developing into several forms such as stem cells. See a commentary on this work as Scientists Debate the Origin of Cell Types in the First Animals by Jordana Cepelewicz in Quanta Magazine (Online July 17, 2019). A widely held but rarely tested hypothesis for the origin of animals is that they evolved from a unicellular ancestor that structurally resembled modern sponge choanocytes and choanoflagellates. Here we test this by comparing the transcriptomes, fates and behaviours of the three primary sponge cell types. Together, these analyses argue against homology of sponge choanocytes and choanoflagellates, and the view that the first multicellular animals were simple balls of cells with limited capacity to differentiate. Instead, our results are consistent with the first animal cell being able to transition between multiple states in a manner similar to modern transdifferentiating and stem cells. (Abstract excerpt) Sole, Ricard, et al. The Road to Synthetic Multicellularity. Current Opinion in Systems Biology. 7/60, 2018. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, and University of Birmingham, UK scientists scope out a project map which scans the journey so far along with a route ahead to spatial patterns, developmental programs, proto-organisms, embodied evolved multicellularity, and long-term evolution via synthetic ecosystems projects. See also, e.g. Model Microbial Communities for Ecosystems Biology in this journal (6/51, 2017). Multicellularity is a crucial innovation that has taken place independently at least 25 times in the evolution of life on our planet. Uncovering the evolutionary rules associated to the emergence of this transition has been partially achieved thanks to a combination of comparative cell biology, phylogenetic, palaeobiology and genomic studies of primitive model organisms. An alternative path to this goal is the use of synthetic and systems approximations including both experimental and mathematical models. Here we review several key results, formulate a list of open problems and suggest potentially relevant avenues to follow at the crossroads between ecology, evolution and development. (Abstract) Trewavas, Anthony. The Green Plant as an Intelligent Organism. Baluska, Frantisek, et al, eds. Communication in Plants. Berlin: Springer, 2006. The University of Edinburgh botanist finds a responsive cognitive capacity across the flora kingdoms similarly distinguished by information processing, learning, decision making, choice, predictive modeling, associative memory, sensory integration, and behavioral control. See also a similar article in Trends in Plant Science for September 2005. Van Gestel, Jordi and Corina Tarnita. On the Origin of Biological Construction, with a Focus on Multicellularity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114/11018, 2017. As the major evolutionary transitions model (see Section VI.H.8) steadily gains acceptance, akin to Sebe-Pedros 2017, University of Zurich and Princeton University systems biologists and ecologists (search each) add a more detailed explanation of how simpler individual organic forms may proceed to join and merge into complex, aggregate whole units. A generic, common life cycle is specified which contributes a perception of the same, independent pattern of diversity, convergence and emergence at work for each nested stage, as the Abstract alludes. A hundred references are cited in support. So in late 2017, unawares as yet, a genesis synthesis becomes robustly evident. Biology is marked by a hierarchical organization: all life consists of cells; in some cases, these cells assemble into groups, such as endosymbionts or multicellular organisms; in turn, multicellular organisms sometimes assemble into yet other groups, such as primate societies or ant colonies. The construction of new organizational layers results from hierarchical evolutionary transitions, in which biological units (e.g., cells) form groups that evolve into new units of biological organization (e.g., multicellular organisms). Despite considerable advances, there is no bottom-up, dynamical account of how, starting from the solitary ancestor, the first groups originate and subsequently evolve the organizing principles that qualify them as new units. Van Gestel, Jordi, et al. From Cell Differentiation to Cell Collectives: Bacillus subtilis Uses Division of Labor to Migrate. PLoS Biology. Online April, 2015. In one more quantification of nature’s propensity to give rise to viable groupings, Harvard Medical School biologists propose this title phenomena as a key factor underlying the diverse origins of multicellularity. A June 2015 review Bacterial Ventures into Multicellularity: Collectivism through Individuality by Simon van Vliet and Martin Ackermann in this journal extols the significance of these research findings. See similar works by Kapheim, Rehan, C. Smith, and others. Some problems can be solved only when individuals act together. This applies to bacteria in the same way that it applies to humans. Here we study how bacteria overcome the environmental challenge of migration over a solid surface by bundling their forces. Migration can be a significant environmental challenge for bacteria, especially when food sources are distributed far apart and have to be reached by movement along a solid surface, where swimming motility does not work. We show that Bacillus subtilis—a common inhabitant of the soil—migrates over a solid surface by forming multicellular structures. Migration depends on the synergistic interaction of two cell types: surfactin-producing and matrix-producing cells. Surfactin-producing cells facilitate migration by reducing the friction between cells and their substrate, thereby allowing matrix-producing cells to organize themselves into bundles that form filamentous loops at the colony edge. Thus, not only do cells act together to overcome the challenge of migration, they also divide labor, in that different cell types specialize on distinct tasks. (Author Summary) Von Bronk, Benedikt, et al. Complex Microbial Systems across Different Level of Description. Physical Biology. Online June, 2018. Ludwig-Maximilians University, Soft Condensed Matter Group researchers study bacterial colonies as exemplars of nonlinear dynamics and topologies, as the late Israeli biophysicst Eshel Ben-Jacob, whose image opens this section, had long advocated. In regard, over the 21st century posting this website, it is can now be reported that every other realm from quantum to literature has been found to match and fulfill this iconic model. Complex biological systems offer a variety of interesting phenomena at the different physical scales. With increasing abstraction, details of the microscopic scales can often be extrapolated to average or typical macroscopic properties. However, emergent properties and cross-scale interactions can impede naïve abstractions and necessitate comprehensive investigations of these complex systems. In this review paper, we focus on microbial communities, and first, summarize a general hierarchy of relevant scales and description levels to understand these complex systems: (1) genetic networks, (2) single cells, (3) populations, and (4) emergent multi-cellular properties. Second, we employ two illustrating examples, microbial competition and biofilm formation, to elucidate how cross-scale interactions and emergent properties enrich the observed multi-cellular behavior in these systems. (Abstract) Wedlich-Soldner, Roland and Timo Betz. Self-Organization: The Fundament of Cell Biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.. Vol.373/Iss.1747, 2018. We enter this introductory note by University of Munster, Cells in Motion Cluster of Excellence, systems scientists both for the special issue, and as the Abstract cites, an example of how into the 2010s nonlinear complex systems dynamics have actuallybecome accepted as a mainstream explanatory paradigm. Among the papers are Self-Organization across Scales: From Molecules to Organisms by Tanumoy Saha and Milos Galic and Self-Organization Principles of Intracellular Pattern Formation by Jacob Halatek, et al (reviewed herein). Self-organization refers to the emergence of an overall order in time and space of a given system that results from the collective interactions of its individual components. This concept has been widely recognized as a core principle in pattern formation for multi-component systems of the physical, chemical and biological world. It can be distinguished from self-assembly by the constant input of energy required to maintain order—and self-organization therefore typically occurs in non-equilibrium or dissipative systems. Cells, with their constant energy consumption and myriads of local interactions between distinct proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids, represent the perfect playground for self-organization. It therefore comes as no surprise that many properties and features of self-organized systems, such as spontaneous formation of patterns, nonlinear coupling of reactions, bi-stable switches, waves and oscillations, are found in all aspects of modern cell biology. Ultimately, self-organization lies at the heart of the robustness and adaptability found in cellular and organismal organization, and hence constitutes a fundamental basis for natural selection and evolution. (Abstract)
Wilkins, Adam.
The Evolution of Developmental Pathways.
Sunderland, MA: Sinauer,
2002.
A contribution to the resurgence of evolutionary developmental biology. Woese, Carl. Interperting the Universal Phylogenetic Tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97/8392, 2000. A review of the past history and present clarifications in specifying the three kingdoms of life with their common root and branches to plants and animals. The above theory makes a testable prediction: the ancestors of the individual domains - the Bacteria, the Archaea, and the eukaryotes - are each communal, and the evidence for their communal nature, in the form of elevated levels of horizontal gene transfer within each domain early on (i.e., transfer involving the ancestors of the major taxa), should still exist. (8395)
Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 Next
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Introduction |
GENESIS VISION |
LEARNING PLANET |
ORGANIC UNIVERSE |