![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
III. Ecosmos: A Revolutionary Fertile, Habitable, Solar-Bioplanet Incubator LifescapeD. Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics of Living Systems Jorgensen, Sven, ed. Thermodynamics and Ecological Modelling. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 2000. A consideration of a proposed “fourth law of thermodynamics” that a growing number of investigators are trying to define in order to quantify the evident rise in animate complexity in cosmic and earthly nature. Kaneko, Kunihiko and Chikara Furesawa. Macroscopic Theory for Evolving Biological Systems Akin to Thermodynamics. Annual Review of Biophysics. 47/273, 2018. University of Tokyo, Universal Biology Institute (see below) biophysicists contribute a unique notice of how microbial phenomena take upon a similar appearance, indeed as a common, manifest affinity, to these physical energies. We present a macroscopic theory to characterize the plasticity, robustness, and evolvability of biological responses and their fluctuations. Overall, these results and support from the theoretical and experimental literature suggest a formulation of cellular systems akin to thermodynamics, in which a macroscopic potential is given by the growth rate (or fitness) represented as a function of environmental and evolutionary changes. (Abstract excerpt) Kempes, Christopher, et al. The Thermodynamic Efficiency of Computations Made in Cells across the Range of Life. arXiv:1706.05043. Kempes and David Wolpert, Santa Fe Institute, Zachery Cohen, University of Illinois, and Juan Perez-Mercader, Harvard University, theorize that evolution’s “subcellular to multicellular” course can be attributed to nested computational processes. This passage is tracked by their relative energetic usages from DNA replication efficiencies to the “collective computation of social groups.” Biological organisms must perform computation as they grow, reproduce, and evolve. Moreover, ever since Landauer's bound was proposed it has been known that all computation has some thermodynamic cost. Accordingly an important issue concerning the evolution of life is assessing the thermodynamic efficiency of the computations performed by organisms. This issue is interesting both from the perspective of how close life has come to maximally efficient computation (presumably under the pressure of natural selection), and from the practical perspective of what efficiencies we might hope that engineered biological computers might achieve, especially in comparison with current computational systems. Here we show that the computational efficiency of translation, defined as free energy expended per amino acid operation, outperforms the best supercomputers by several orders of magnitude, and is only about an order of magnitude worse than the Landauer bound. (Abstract excerpts) Kleidon, Axel. How Does the Earth System Generate and Maintain Thermodynamic Disequilibrium and What does it Imply for the Future of the Planet?.. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 370/1012, 2012. Reviewed more in A Living Planet, Kleidon’s web page as Director of Biospheric Theory and Modelling at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry lists him as mathematician, physicist, meteorologist, and his “research interests” as “atmosphere-biosphere interactions, geographic patterns of plant biodiversity, global vegetation modelling, non-equilibrium thermodynamics of Earth system processes, Gaia hypothesis, Earth system evolution, natural limits of renewable energies, geoengineering,” a leader in the theoretical explanation, fostering, and practice of A Thermodynamics of Life. With many colleagues, his well regarded papers such as this continue apace - search here and his website. Kleidon, Axel. Thermodynamic Foundations of the Earth System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. The MPI for Biogeochemistry mathematical meteorologist (search) accomplishes a frontier synthesis of thermodynamic theories so as to apply to all manner of biospheric and anthropic realms. Typical chapters run from Energy and Entropy, and Dynamics, Structures, and Maximization to Hydrologic Cycling and Human Activity. Final sections consider how such findings can provide remedial guidance in Habitable Planets and Life, Planetary Evolution, Optimization, and Regulation, and A Sustainable Future. The combination of dissipative structures and their interactions with the boundary conditions of the system can thus provide an extremely powerful theory to understand evolutionary dynamics in general terms. Evolutionary dynamics would reflect the overarching acceleration of the direction imposed by the second law, making dissipative structures more dissipative through the interaction with their boundary conditions and making processes evolve towards their thermodynamic limit. It would allow us to understand the evolutionary target of thermodynamic systems, from atmospheric convection to river networks, terrestrial vegetation, and the Earth system as a whole. (14) Kleidon, Axel, et al, eds. Maximum Entropy Production in Ecological and Environmental Systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 365/1297, 2010. A special issue on this non-equilibrium thermodynamic theory with typical papers such as “It is not the entropy you produce, rather, how you produce it” by Tyler Volk and Olivier Pauluis, “The Constructal Law of Design and Evolution in Nature” by Adrian Bejan and Sylvie Lorente, and Roderick Dewar’s “Maximun Entropy Production and Plant Optimization Theories.” The coupled biosphere–atmosphere system entails a vast range of processes at different scales, from ecosystem exchange fluxes of energy, water and carbon to the processes that drive global biogeochemical cycles, atmospheric composition and, ultimately, the planetary energy balance. These processes are generally complex with numerous interactions and feedbacks, and they are irreversible in their nature, thereby producing entropy. The proposed principle of maximum entropy production (MEP), based on statistical mechanics and information theory, states that thermodynamic processes far from thermodynamic equilibrium will adapt to steady states at which they dissipate energy and produce entropy at the maximum possible rate. Kondepudi, Dilip, et al. From Dissipative Structures to Biological Evolution: A Thermodynamic Perspective. Dambricourt Malasse, Anne, ed. Self-Organization as a New Paradigm in Evolutionary Biology. International: Springer, 2022. In this frontier collection, Wake Forest University and University of Connecticut theorists describe a further deep physical influence which serves to energize life’s organized emergence. In the second half of the twentieth century, it was recognized that systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium can spontaneously self-organize into dissipative structures that exhibit oscillating chemical patterns. Many advances came from the Brussels School of Thermodynamics under the leadership of Ilya Prigogine. The 21st century, decade has given us a new perspective on the emergence of organism-like behavior in non-living systems. This chapter will review the relationship between this generative phenomena and biological evolution. (Abstract) Kupervasser, Oleg, et al. The Universal Arrow Time. Foundations of Physics. 42/9, 2012. In a paper available at arXiv:1011.4173, Physicists Kupervasser, Moscow State University, with Hrvoje Nikolic and Vinko Zlatic, Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, make a sophisticated case for a vectorial cosmos seemingly on a developmental pathway toward dynamic unfoldings of increasingly complex and cognitive beings. Statistical physics cannot explain why a thermodynamic arrow of time exists, unless one postulates very special and unnatural initial conditions. Yet, we argue that statistical physics can explain why the thermodynamic arrow of time is universal, i.e., why the arrow points in the same direction everywhere. Namely, if two subsystems have opposite arrow-directions initially, the interaction between them makes the configuration statistically unstable and causes a decay towards a system with a universal direction of the arrow of time. We present general qualitative arguments for that claim and support them by a detailed analysis of a toy model based on the baker’s map. (Abstract) Kurzynski, Michal. The Thermodynamic Machinery of Life. Berlin: Springer, 2006. Another Springer Frontiers Collection edition. We again quote from a web page, but as an example of an inappropriate mechanical paradigm of living systems. What will it take to realize a fundamental organic genesis creation? The Thermodynamic Machinery of Life presents the relevant foundations of nonequilibrium thermodynamics as applied to biological processes taking place at the subcellular level. The biological cell is considered as a complex open thermodynamic system far from equilibrium that enzymatically controls various biochemical reactions and transport processes across internal and the cytoplasmatic membrane. The enzymatic free energy and signal transduction processes are described in detail. All the biological molecular machines, also pumps and motors are considered to be effective chemo-chemical free energy transducers. Special attention is paid to the role of the mesoscopic internal dynamics of biomolecules in the activity control of enzymes and the action of molecular machines. Layzer, David. Cosmogenesis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. The Harvard astrophysicist provides theoretical insights into how an expanding universe can offset the second law by its generation of hierarchical order and information. Lineweaver, Charles and Charles Egan. Life, Gravity and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Physics of Life Reviews. 5/4, 2008. In this online journal, Australian astrophysicists contend that cosmic “gravitational collapse” is the driving source of free energy for evolving life. A “pyramid” thus accrues from baryon non-conservation to ‘heterotrophs’ (multicellular organisms) whose latest sapient human phase can trace such ancestry. All dissipative structures in the universe including all forms of life, owe their existence to the fact that the universe started in a low entropy state and has not yet reached equilibrium. The low initial entropy was due to the low gravitational entropy of the nearly homogeneously distributed matter and has, through gravitational collapse, evolved gradients in density, temperature, pressure and chemistry. These gradients, when steep enough, give rise to far from equilibrium dissipative structures (e.g., galaxies, stars, black holes, hurricanes and life) which emerge spontaneously to hasten the destruction of the gradients which spawned them. (Abstract) Lineweaver, Charles, et al, eds. Complexity and the Arrow of Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Leading thinkers such as Paul Davies, Eric Chaisson, Seth Lloyd, Simon Conway Morris, David Krakauer, and Philip Clayton, explore nature’s evident propensity from universe to humankind to become more intricately arranged, organic, and cognizant. Its main sections cover Cosmological, Physical, Biological, Evolutionary, Informational, and Philosophical perspectives. Search each name above, especially Chaisson, for more commentary.
Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Introduction |
GENESIS VISION |
LEARNING PLANET |
ORGANIC UNIVERSE |